Rights Management Scenario
Built Content: Legacy Tobacco Documents
(DRAFT)
Introduction
The Legacy Tobacco Documents collection contains 7 million documents related to advertising, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and scientific research of tobacco products that were produced during litigation against a number of tobacco companies. These documents - gathered by UCSF - are being submitted to the University of California Digital Preservation Repository for long term preservation.
Users and Uses
Preservation only.
The Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (LTDL) maintains a separate website for accessing the document collection. In addition, a court order - the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) - dictates that the tobacco companies involved must maintain a website at their own expense to make these documents available to the public.
Characteristics(features)
- All content from:
- Internal corporate tobacco company documents and memos
- Witness depositions and trial transcripts
- A court order (the MSA) dictates that all documents (including those produced in future civil actions) must be made available to the public
- No permissions obtained after content had been collected
Possible Problems
- Personal privacy issues - the documents may contain SSNs, full names, contact information, etc.
- Copyright status is a little unclear, given the disparate origins of the documents
The documents were made publicly available by the MSA, which contains a clause excluding the publication of personal information
- Given the size and format (poor quality images) of the collection, it is not possible to examine the content of all documents for any information of a sensitive nature
- No assurances for content.
- Consent is “passive”.
Legal Issues
- The exposure of personal information may infringe on privacy rights
Data Requirements Issues
Forthcoming
Records Management Issues
- Breaches in the security of the management system exposes UC to a myriad of legal problems (SB 1386)
- Future dissemination and publication of the objects (when retrieved from the repository) are problematic